From

Location

Message

Date Posted

British Columbia, Canada

http://www.bigpumpkins.com/Diary/DiaryViewOne.asp?eid=248980

Good luck Josiah. I tried to find out what the max weight was on the scale but I have no idea. It's big, let's just say that.

10/7/2015 1:01:30 PM

Little-TON - Colorado

One could always offset minus the scale...say 200 pounds...and see what it says....

10/7/2015 1:27:28 PM

Central NY

lol.. That's fn great..lol... Best of luck mellow, I'd be shitin a brick...

10/7/2015 1:47:08 PM

Alex, IN

Amazing! Cant wait to see what she weighes saturday!

10/7/2015 2:27:54 PM

Deer Park, WI

Wizzzzzzzzzzzzz, we did exactly that in a patch here recently and found that the scale will not measure more than 2000lbs of load, even if the "tare" weight is deep into negative territory.

great suggestion tho.

10/7/2015 2:28:29 PM

Eddyz@efirehose.net

You could run a beam above with 2 scales, one on each end. then subtract the rigging weight

10/7/2015 3:20:32 PM

Home of happy lil plants

http://www.scalesgalore.com/m/m_product_list.cfm?Cat_sub_id=90001291#/m/m_product.cfm?product_id=70000328833

time for the big scale

10/7/2015 3:23:31 PM

Colorado

I did the math and I think that means over 2000-can you feel me

10/7/2015 5:47:38 PM

Deer Park, WI

Scherber...that's pretty brilliant math. Impressive. haha. Im feeling ya....but there are folks out there who'd probably think thats not right. haha x 2.

10/7/2015 7:39:21 PM

Central Illinois

can you apply enough upward force to make it show a weight, that would give you a clue

10/8/2015 8:42:36 AM

Deer Park, WI

Yes, but we already know the scale only gives the "OVEr" reading after it surpasses 1990lbs. One could apply upward force until it read 1990 again, but you'd have no way to measure how much force you are applying upward, which is the million dollar question in these circumstances, unless you were applying the upward force with a second scale...

10/8/2015 2:17:43 PM